Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 72/02 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review due to lack of joint signature and recusal violation in administrative tribunal ruling.

Case Number III RN 72/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against an administrative tribunal's decision regarding a trademark application. The tribunal had issued a ruling without all members signing it and included a judge who previously handled the case as an expert. The court held that the administrative tribunal operates as a collegial body bound by general procedural rules requiring full signatures and strict recusal to ensure procedural integrity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 245 ust. 1 Prawa własności przemysłowej; Art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.a.; Art. 277 Prawa własności przemysłowej: A collegial body issuing a ruling must sign it jointly, and procedural safeguards like recusal apply to prevent bias in administrative proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review collegial body joint signature recusal rule procedural integrity administrative tribunal trademark registration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 245 ust. 1 Prawa własności przemysłowej
Art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.a.
Art. 277 Prawa własności przemysłowej
Art. 24 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.a.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 107 § 1 k.p
art. 24 § 1 pkt 5 k.p
art. 127 § 3 k.p
art. 39311 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text