Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III KRS 7/02 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses judge's appeal regarding late application for extension beyond age 65 due to new regulation timing.

Case Number III KRS 7/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Judge Danuta S.'s appeal against the Supreme Council's refusal to extend her tenure beyond age 65. The Council rejected her request because it was filed after the six-month deadline set by a regulation that had not yet entered into force at the time of filing. The Court ruled that the Council's internal opinion regarding the deadline could not bind the judge once the formal regulation was published, thereby validating the Council's decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 69 § 3 ust. 1 Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych; § 29 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Prezydenta RP: A judge's request for tenure extension cannot be deemed untimely if the relevant procedural regulation was not yet in force when the deadline was calculated based on the Council's prior opinion.

Keywords

AI generated
tenure extension age 65 retirement procedural deadline regulation entry into force Supreme Council of Judiciary judicial tenure administrative appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 69 § 1 ust. 4 Konstytucji
Art. 69 § 3 ust. 1 Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
§ 29 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Prezydenta RP z dnia 22 grudnia 2001 r.
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa
§ 28 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Prezydenta RP z dnia 22 grudnia 2001 r.
art. 180 ust. 4 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text