I PKN 458/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed patent incentive claim due to temporary nature of technical solution lacking lasting innovation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the patentee's appeal regarding an inflated incentive payment for a technical improvement. The court found the proposed solution was merely a temporary fix for a machine failure rather than a permanent innovation. Consequently, the court rejected the calculation of economic effects based on total production volume.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o wynalazczości; ustawa o Urzędzie Patentowym Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej: A technical solution characterized as a temporary, one-time measure to resolve an immediate malfunction does not constitute a rationalization project eligible for patent incentives if it lacks lasting structural change or permanent economic effect.
Keywords
AI generated
patent incentive
rationalization project
technical innovation
economic effect
temporary solution
patentee claim
production volume
Cited Legislation
AI generatedUstawa z dnia 30 października 1992 r. o zmianie ustawy o wynalazczości i ustawy o Urzędzie Patentowym Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
ustawa z dnia 19 października 1972 r. o wynalazczości
art. 1 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 231 k.p.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 391 §1 k.p.c
art. 2 k.p.c
art. 5 k.c
art. 244 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIV CK 161/81