Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 13/02 AI generated

Supreme Court allows tax penalty for poor record-keeping when documentary evidence exists, rejecting reliance on estimation methods.

Case Number III RN 13/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the taxpayer's appeal, overturning the lower court's decision to apply a tax penalty based on estimated income. The tax authorities had imposed a fine because the taxpayer failed to properly record sales of scrap metal, relying on documents rather than estimation methods. The court ruled that the statutory penalty applies even when documentary evidence exists, rejecting the lower court's error in applying estimation rules unnecessarily.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 30 ust. 7 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych; Art. 23 § 1 i 2 Ordynacji podatkowej: The tax penalty for poor record-keeping applies whenever documentary evidence allows determining unrecorded income, rendering the estimation method unnecessary.

Keywords

AI generated
tax penalty for poor record keeping documentary evidence vs estimation income tax liability tax audit procedure supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 30 ust. 7 ustawy z dnia 26 lipca 1991 r. o podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych
Art. 23 § 1 Ordynacji podatkowej
Art. 23 § 2 Ordynacji podatkowej
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 39313 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text