Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 236/01 AI generated

Conditional dismissal of criminal proceedings does not trigger loss of councilor mandate under election law.

Case Number III RN 236/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's decision regarding the loss of a councilor's mandate due to a conditional dismissal of criminal charges. The council had declared the mandate void based on a final judgment that conditionally dismissed proceedings for intentional misconduct, arguing this constituted a conviction. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for mandate loss applies only to final convicting judgments, not conditional dismissals, to uphold the constitutional presumption of innocence. Consequently, the mandate remained valid despite the conditional dismissal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 190 ust. 1 pkt 4 Ordynacji wyborczej; Art. 42 ust. 3 Konstytucji RP: The loss of a councilor's mandate occurs solely upon a final convicting judgment for intentional crime, excluding conditional dismissals of criminal proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
conditional dismissal councilor mandate presumption of innocence election law intentional crime

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 190 ust. 1 pkt 4 Ordynacji wyborczej
Art. 42 ust. 3 Konstytucji RP
Art. 336 k.p.k.
Art. 341 k.p.k.
Art. 342 k.p.k.
Art. 414 k.p.k.
Art. 82 pkt 14 ustawy o bezpośrednim wyborze wójta, burmistrza i prezydenta miasta
art. 212 § 1 k.k
art. 42 ust. 3 Konstytucji
art. 42 ust. 3 Konstytucji RP

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text