Supreme Court dismissed cassation as clear legal error did not affect the final judgment outcome.

The Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal filed by an employee seeking reinstatement against his employer. The lower courts dismissed the claim because the employee continued competing business activities despite his employer's objections and refusal to sign a non-compete agreement. The Supreme Court held that while the lower courts may have misinterpreted Article 1011 of the Labor Code, this error did not alter the final decision since the employee's conduct clearly violated his duty of care under Article 100 and constituted an abuse of trade union rights under Article 8. Consequently, the cassation was not admitted for review as the legal error was not decisive for the judgment.