III DS 18/02
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal; client convenience and agreement are not special circumstances under Notary Act Art. 3.2.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a disciplinary ruling finding a notary guilty of professional misconduct. The notary argued that client agreement and convenience justified performing 480 notarial acts outside his office, violating Art. 3 of the Notary Act. The court held that such factors do not constitute 'special circumstances' allowing exceptions to the rule of performing acts within the office.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3 § 2 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 14 lutego 1991 r. Prawo o notariacie; Zgodna wola stron i wygoda nie są szczególnymi okolicznościami pozwalającymi na wykonywanie czynności notarialnych poza kancelarią.
Keywords
AI generated
notary act
disciplinary proceedings
special circumstances
professional misconduct
office location
client agreement
cassation appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 3 § 2 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 14 lutego 1991 r. Prawo o notariacie
§ 26 pkt 7 Kodeksu Etyki Zawodowej Notariusza
art. 51 § 1 pkt 1 Ustawy Prawo o notariacie
art. 63e Prawo o notariacie
art. 67 Prawo o notariacie
art. 537 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 31 ust. 3 Konstytucji RP
art. 47 k.p.k
art. 457 § 2 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k