Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PKN 632/01 AI generated

Teacher's consent to extra hours does not imply consent to lower pay rates.

Case Number I PKN 632/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of a teacher's claim for additional pay for overtime hours. The teacher argued that working beyond his standard teaching load violated his personal rights and caused health damage, but the lower courts had not examined this specific claim. The Supreme Court ruled that while consent to extra hours does not automatically mean consent to a lower wage rate, the teacher failed to properly assert his personal rights claims in the first instance, making his cassation arguments inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 102 ust. 1 ustawy o szkolnictwie wyższym; Art. 23 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.: Consent to additional teaching hours does not imply consent to a lower hourly wage rate, but a claim for damages based on personal rights must be properly asserted in the first instance proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
academic teacher employment overtime compensation rates personal rights protection cassation admissibility labor law standards

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 102 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o szkolnictwie wyższym
Art. 23 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.
Art. 24 k.c.
Art. 448 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 13 k.p
art. 134 k.p
art. 193 Konstytucji RP
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 80 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text