Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 81/02 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of professional soldier due to missing statutory termination date and procedure.

Case Number III RN 81/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the Minister's decision dismissing a professional soldier from service without specifying a termination date or legal procedure. The soldier had refused to serve in the State Security Service, leading the Minister to dismiss him under Article 139 of the State Security Service Act. The court ruled that this article only defines the subject of dismissal but fails to establish the specific legal ground or date required by the Military Service Act. Consequently, the dismissal was found to be a gross violation of statutory requirements for ending a professional soldier's service relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 139 ust. 2 ustawy o Biurze Ochrony Rządu; Art. 78 ust. 2 ustawy o służbie wojskowej żołnierzy zawodowych: A dismissal of a professional soldier requires explicit statutory grounds and a defined termination date; a provision merely identifying the subject of dismissal without specifying the legal basis or date constitutes a gross violation of the law.

Keywords

AI generated
professional soldier dismissal State Security Service Act Military Service Act termination date requirement legal ground specification administrative review gross violation of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 139 ust. 2 of the Act of 16 March 2001 on the State Security Service
Art. 78 ust. 2 of the Act of 30 June 1970 on the military service of professional soldiers
Art. 32 ust. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland
art. 32 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 32 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego w Warszawie z dnia 23 stycznia 2002 r.
Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego w Warszawie z dnia 18 lutego 2002 r. (OSA 9/01)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text