Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 47/02 AI generated

Supreme Court held NSA lacks jurisdiction over Border Guard disciplinary appeals unless specific law grants it.

Case Number III RN 47/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland granted a revision against a decision by the Chief Administrative Court in Warsaw that dismissed a Border Guard officer's disciplinary appeal. The Chief Administrative Court had ruled it lacked jurisdiction because no general law assigned such disciplinary matters to it. However, the Supreme Court found that the specific Border Guard Act explicitly grants officers the right to appeal disciplinary rulings to an administrative court, thereby overriding the general exclusion rule.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 19 pkt 3 ustawy o NSA; Art. 136b ust. 5 ustawy o Straży Granicznej: The Chief Administrative Court lacks jurisdiction over disciplinary appeals unless a specific statute explicitly grants such jurisdiction, and in this case, the Border Guard Act specifically confers that right.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative jurisdiction disciplinary proceedings Border Guard Act Chief Administrative Court statutory override revision procedure legal competence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 19 pkt 3 of the Act of the Chief Administrative Court
Art. 136b ust. 5 of the Border Guard Act
Art. 27 ust. 2 of the Act of the Chief Administrative Court
Art. 2 and Art. 45 ust. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland
Art. 57 ust. 2 of the Act on the Chief Administrative Court
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text