Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 171/01 AI generated

Supreme Court allows single expert opinion in tax valuation, rejecting need for multiple experts under old law.

Case Number III RN 171/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland allowed the tax authority to rely on a single expert's opinion for valuing company shares in a 1996 tax dispute. The General Prosecutor argued that the law required multiple experts, but the Court found the statute only mandated considering expert opinions without specifying a number. The Court ruled that the law's purpose was to ensure accurate valuation, not to mandate a specific quantity of experts, thus validating the single expert's evidence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 ust. 3 ustawy o podatku dochodowym od osób prawnych; The provision requiring expert opinions does not specify a minimum number of experts, allowing a single expert's opinion to suffice for establishing asset value.

Keywords

AI generated
tax valuation procedure expert opinion admissibility single expert sufficiency income tax law administrative review evidence standard share price assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 ust. 3 zdanie drugie in fine ustawy z dnia 15 lutego 1992 r. o podatku dochodowym od osób prawnych
Art. 22 ust. 1 pkt 1 i ust. 2 pkt 1 i 3 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 roku o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 393 ust. 13 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text