III RN 148/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review as it cannot review factual findings absent procedural violation claims.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the Chief Administrative Court's decision regarding a bus transport license. The applicant argued procedural violations, but the review focused on alleged material law errors rather than procedural defects. The court ruled that extraordinary review cannot re-evaluate factual findings unless a procedural violation is specifically alleged.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 10 of the Act amending the Act of 1 March 1996; extraordinary review cannot review factual findings unless procedural violations are alleged.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary review
factual findings
procedural violations
administrative law
transport license
material law error
subsumption
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 10 of the Act amending the Act of 1 March 1996
Art. 22 ust. 1 pkt 1 and ust. 2 pkt 1 of the Act on the Chief Administrative Court
Art. 16 ust. 4 of the Act of 2 August 1997 on conditions for performing international road transport
Art. 16 ust. 1 of the Act of 2 August 1997 on conditions for performing international road transport