III RN 38/02
AI generated
Retrial dismissed because labor court, not administrative court, has jurisdiction over retired judges' employment disputes.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary retrial filed by a retired judge against an administrative court ruling. The judge argued that the administrative court lacked jurisdiction because his dispute concerned a labor relationship governed by the Judges' Organization Act. The court held that disputes regarding a retired judge's employment status fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the labor court, not the administrative court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 68 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 pkt 1 u.o.n.s.a.: Disputes concerning the employment status of a judge in retirement are within the jurisdiction of the labor court and not the administrative court.
Keywords
AI generated
retired judge employment
labor court jurisdiction
administrative court competence
judges organization act
extraordinary retrial dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 68 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 683 k.r.s.
Art. 18 pkt 1 u.o.n.s.a.
Art. 39316 k.p.c.
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP