III RN 52/02
AI generated
Supreme Court allows appeal against municipal council decision on taxi equipment by extending filing deadline.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court set aside the lower administrative court's dismissal of a union's appeal regarding mandatory taxi printer installation. The union argued the statutory deadline for filing the appeal was unreasonably short and violated their right to a fair trial under the ECHR. The court held that strict procedural deadlines cannot deprive parties of effective access to justice if they have diligently pursued their rights.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 35 ust. 1 ustawy o NSA; Art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka: Procedural time limits must not restrict access to court to the point of violating the essence of the right to a fair trial.
Keywords
AI generated
access to court
statutory time limits
right to fair trial
administrative appeal
effective remedy
ECHR Article 6
procedural rigidity
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 35 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji z dnia 4 listopada 1950 r. o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności
Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 39315 KPC
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 241 ust. 1 Konstytucji
Cited Case Law
AI generatedK 28/99
Constitutional Court dismisses complaint as unnecessary due to lack of evidence of unconstitutional practice change.
Levages Prestations Services przeciwko Francji
Brualla Gómez de la Torre przeciwko Hiszpanii
Delcourt przeciwko Belgii
De Geouffre de la Pradelle przeciwko Francji
Airey przeciwko Irlandii
Hennings przeciwko Niemcom
Perez de Rada Cavanilles przeciwko Hiszpanii