Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 5/02 AI generated

Bankruptcy does not suspend labor reinstatement proceedings; the case continues against the trustee.

Case Number III PZP 5/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that declaring a company bankrupt does not require suspending labor reinstatement proceedings under Article 174 § 1(4) of the Civil Procedure Code. The plaintiff sought reinstatement after being dismissed, while the employer claimed suspension was necessary due to bankruptcy proceedings. The court held that the dispute concerns the employee's claim, which remains actionable against the bankruptcy trustee rather than the insolvent entity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 174 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.; Art. 20 § 1, Art. 59, Art. 90 up. p. When a debtor's bankruptcy is declared, labor reinstatement proceedings must continue against the trustee and do not require suspension.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy declaration labor reinstatement civil procedure code bankruptcy trustee suspension of proceedings insolvency proceedings employment dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 174 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
Art. 20 § 1 up. p.
Art. 59 up. p.
Art. 90 up. p.
Art. 161 § 2 up. p.
Art. 165 up. p.
Art. 47 k.p.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text