I PZ 58/02
AI generated
Notification of lawyer dismissal to court invalidates prior service; appeal deadline does not start until court is notified.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court overturned the lower court's rejection of the plaintiff's appeal, ruling that the lawyer's dismissal was ineffective until the court was notified. The plaintiff's former lawyer submitted the appeal before the court received notice of the client's instruction to withdraw him. The court held that procedural acts by a former lawyer remain valid until the court is informed of the withdrawal, thereby preserving the appeal's timeliness.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 94 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.; Notification of lawyer dismissal to the court is required for the withdrawal to be effective; procedural acts by a former lawyer remain valid until such notification.
Keywords
AI generated
lawyer dismissal
court notification
procedural validity
appeal deadline
representation withdrawal
legal representation
civil procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 94 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 94 § 1 k.p.c
art. 369 § 1 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedC.I. 1309/35
C.II. 2129/37
III CZP 33/87