Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PKN 164/01 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; teacher's letter was valid termination, not just a proposal for reduced hours.

Case Number I PKN 164/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a teacher against a school's termination of her employment contract. The court held that a letter offering reduced working hours or transfer to inactive status did not constitute a valid termination declaration under the Teachers' Charter. Consequently, the lower court's finding that the employer's May 16 letter was a clear termination was upheld as legally correct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 30 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.; Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 22 ust. 2 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 65 § 1 k.c.: A letter offering alternative employment arrangements or transfer to inactive status does not constitute a valid declaration of will to terminate the employment contract if it lacks an unequivocal expression of the employer's intent to end the relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
termination of employment Teachers' Charter declaration of will reduced working hours inactive status transfer cassation appeal labor law interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 30 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.
Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 22 ust. 2 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 65 § 1 k.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 65 k.c
art. 328 k.p.c
art. 39311 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PKN 32/00, Wokanda 2001 nr 7-8, poz. 62

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text