Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 64/01 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling VAT penalty on civil partnership violates Constitution by imposing dual liability on partners.

Case Number III RN 64/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the tax authority's decision to impose an additional VAT liability on a civil partnership. The court found that applying the specific VAT penalty provision to the partnership would effectively punish its individual partners twice for the same act, violating the principle of legality under the Constitution. Consequently, the court declared the contested tax provision unconstitutional and void, thereby upholding the lower court's decision to reject the penalty.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 27 ust. 5 i 6 ustawy o podatku od towarów i usług; Art. 864 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 2 Konstytucji RP: Imposing an additional tax liability on a civil partnership of natural persons does not alter the rule that partners bear joint and several liability, and such imposition violates the Constitution by subjecting partners to both administrative and criminal sanctions for the same act.

Keywords

AI generated
civil partnership liability VAT additional liability Constitutional unconstitutionality joint and several liability double jeopardy principle tax administrative penalty fiscal code violation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 27 ust. 5 i 6 ustawy z dnia 8 stycznia 1993 r. o podatku od towarów i usług oraz o podatku akcyzowym
Art. 864 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 2 Konstytucji RP
Art. 22 ust. 1 pkt 1, ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 19 listopada 1999 r. Prawo działalności gospodarczej
Art. 54 Kodeksu karnego skarbowego
art. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 2 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 29 kwietnia 1998 r., K 17/97
Sąd Najwyższy, uchwała składu siedmiu sędziów z dnia 26 stycznia 1996 r., III CZP 111/95
Sąd Najwyższy, wyrok z dnia 13 listopada 1997 r., I CKN 710/97
III CZP 111/95

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text