Non-compete clause must match employer's business scope; non-competes do not violate a doctor's profession essence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal seeking reinstatement and the invalidation of a non-compete agreement. The plaintiff argued she was forced to sign the clause without negotiation, while the defendant maintained her employment relationship remained unchanged from a primary contract. The court ruled that non-compete clauses must be tied to the employer's specific business scope and that such agreements do not contradict the essence of a doctor's profession.