Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 4/02 AI generated

Individual dismissal during collective layoff period remains individual, not collective, under Polish labor law.

Case Number III PZP 4/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that an individual dismissal occurring within a three-month collective layoff window retains its individual character. The employer argued that the subsequent collective dismissals should merge the termination into a group layoff, but the court rejected this. The decision clarifies that each collective layoff cycle is distinct and that dismissals outside the specific timeframe of a given cycle are treated as individual terminations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; Art. 10 tej ustawy: Individual dismissals made before or after the statutory three-month period of a collective layoff retain their individual character and do not lose that status due to subsequent collective dismissals.

Keywords

AI generated
individual dismissal collective layoff three-month period labor law dismissal procedure economic reasons individual vs collective

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw
Art. 10 tej ustawy
Art. 110 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 112 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 300 Kodeksu pracy

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text