Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III KRS 2/02 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against KRS refusal to renew judge's post after age 65, citing specific KRS Act provisions.

Case Number III KRS 2/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Andrzej W.'s appeal against the National Council of the Judiciary's refusal to renew his judicial post after he turned 65. The Council had previously rejected the request, and the Supreme Court reviewed the case under the specific procedural rules of the KRS Act rather than the Administrative Code. The court ruled that the Council acted within its statutory powers and that the appellant's arguments regarding procedural violations and lack of legal reasoning were inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 12 ust. 5 ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa; Art. 393 § 1, 2 KPC: In proceedings before the National Council of the Judiciary regarding the consent to continue a judge's post after age 65, the Administrative Code does not apply, and the Supreme Court is bound by the factual findings of the Council's decision.

Keywords

AI generated
National Council of Judiciary judge retirement age administrative procedure exclusion Supreme Court review limits judicial post renewal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 12 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa
Art. 393 § 1, 2 KPC
Art. 10 KPA
Art. 107 § 2 KPA
Art. 69 § 1 ustawy o ustroju sądów powszechnych
art. 32 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III KRS 1/02
Supreme Court dismisses judge's appeal, ruling KRS cannot be bound by pre-trial rules and must consider its own criteria.
Wyrok SA w Krakowie z dnia 26 lutego 2001 r.
Wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 24 czerwca 1998 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text