I PKN 44/01
AI generated
Employment law ruling: unilateral salary reduction requires change notice even if total pay remains unchanged.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially quashed the lower court's judgment regarding an employee's claim for unpaid salary and reinstatement. The court found that the employer's unilateral reduction of the basic salary to offset a higher functional allowance violated the requirement for a change notice under Article 42 of the Labor Code. Consequently, the claim for unpaid wages was remitted for reconsideration, while the claim for vacation compensation was dismissed due to lack of specific legal arguments in the cassation appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 42 § 1 k.p.; Art. 42 § 2 k.p.: A unilateral reduction of basic salary to compensate for an increased functional allowance requires a change notice, even if the total remuneration remains unchanged.
Keywords
AI generated
unilateral salary reduction
change notice requirement
functional allowance
labor code violation
cassation procedure
remitted for reconsideration
vacation compensation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 42 § 1 k.p.
Art. 42 § 2 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 482 § 1 k.c.
art. 42 § 1 k.p
art. 42 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 482 § 1 k.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c