III RN 47/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review filed late because service was to counsel, not the client directly.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the First President of the Supreme Court against a lower administrative court ruling. The review was submitted on March 12, 2001, but the judgment with reasoning was served to the client's appointed lawyer on September 4, 2000. The court held that the six-month deadline for filing the review runs from the date of service to the legal representative, rendering the filing untimely.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 57 ust. 2 ustawy o NSA; art. 40 § 2 KPA: The six-month period for filing an extraordinary review commences from the date of service of the judgment to the party's legal representative, not the party personally.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary review
service of process
legal representative
statutory deadline
administrative procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 57 ust. 2 of the Act of 11 May 1995 on the Supreme Administrative Court
Art. 10 of the Act of 1 March 1996 amending the Civil Procedure Code
Art. 40 § 2 of the Civil Procedure Code
Art. 59 of the Act on the Supreme Administrative Court
Art. 3938 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure