Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 959/00 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes lower court dismissal, allowing employee to sue former employer for employment period determination.

Case Number I PKN 959/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's action against the former employer. The plaintiff sought to establish his employment period to qualify for free share acquisition rights under the privatization law. The court ruled that disputes regarding the employment duration must be decided against the former employer, not the State Treasury, before the share purchase agreement is finalized. Consequently, the case was remanded to the district court for a new decision on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 30 sierpnia 1996 r. o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstw państwowych; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.: Disputes concerning the employment period required for free share acquisition under the privatization act must be adjudicated against the former employer in a separate proceeding prior to the conclusion of the share purchase agreement with the State Treasury.

Keywords

AI generated
free share acquisition employment period determination privatization law former employer liability State Treasury shares labor dispute procedure remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 ust. 1 of the Act of 30 August 1996 on the commercialization and privatization of state-owned enterprises
Art. 393 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 108 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art.189 k.p.c
art. 476 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 386 § 4 k.p.c
art. 39313 §1 k.p.c
art.108 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text