Vague combatant activity definition in ZBOWiD decision does not justify stripping veteran rights if evidence supports statutory entitlement.

The Supreme Court set aside a lower court ruling that revoked a veteran's rights due to an imprecise description of his combatant activities by the ZBOWiD. The applicant argued that his role as a scout within a specific airborne unit qualified him for benefits under the Combattants Act, while the lower court rejected this based on the organization's broad definition of his work. The court held that the administrative body failed to prove the applicant's activities did not fall under the statutory definitions of combatant service, thus preventing the revocation of his entitlements.