Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III UZP 1/02 AI generated

Military service in former USSR and Kazakhstan after 1955 is not allied army service for pension purposes.

Case Number III UZP 1/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for a military pension based on service in the former USSR and Kazakhstan. The lower court incorrectly interpreted the 1993 Pension Act to include all service in Warsaw Pact armies from 1939 to 1997. The Supreme Court ruled that the term 'allied army' strictly refers to the World War II era, not the post-1955 Warsaw Pact, and that such service constitutes only a contributory period rather than a basis for pension rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 1b ustawy z 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych i ich rodzin; Military service performed by repatriates in the former USSR and Kazakhstan after 1955 does not constitute service in an allied army under the 1993 Pension Act.

Keywords

AI generated
military pension rights allied army definition Warsaw Pact service repatriate status contributory period pension eligibility historical interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 ust. 1 pkt 1b of the Act of 10 December 1993 on pension provision for professional soldiers and their families
Art. 32 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 of the Act of 17 October 1991 on revaluation of pensions and allowances
Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 9 of the Act of 17 December 1998 on pensions and allowances from the Social Insurance Fund
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 32 Konstytucji

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text