III RN 220/00
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review, ruling third-party interest protection requires objective technical compliance assessment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by Halina O. against a building usage permit decision. The court found that the review was based solely on material law violations regarding third-party interests, which must be assessed objectively based on current technical standards and building codes. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's rejection of the claim, confirming that the permit was correctly issued to the investor without procedural errors.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 Prawa budowlanego z 1974 r.; Art. 39311 KPC: Protection of legitimate third-party interests under the Building Law must rely exclusively on an objective assessment of compliance with current technical and design requirements.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary review dismissal
third party interests
building law compliance
objective technical assessment
usage permit decision
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 Prawa budowlanego z 1974 r.
Art. 39311 § 1 i § 2 KPC
Art. 3931 pkt 1 i pkt 2 KPC
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 42 Prawa budowlanego z 1974 r.
Art. 40 Prawa budowlanego z 1974 r.
Art. 37 ust. 1 pkt 2 Prawa budowlanego z 1974 r.
Art. 22 ust. 2 pkt 3 ustawy o NSA