III RN 202/00
AI generated
Customs court dismissed appeal because customs failed to prove value determination impossible before using fallback method.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the General Customs Office's decision to determine customs value under Article 29 of the Customs Code. The importer argued the invoice was unreliable, but the court found the lower court failed to demonstrate that value could not be established under Articles 25 through 28 first. Consequently, the court ruled that applying Article 29 without exhausting prior statutory steps constituted a serious violation of the Customs Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 23 § 1, Art. 29 Kodeksu celnego: The customs authority must first attempt to determine customs value under Articles 25-28; Article 29 applies only if value cannot be established under those preceding provisions.
Keywords
AI generated
customs value determination
transaction value rejection
substitute value method
procedural exhaustion requirement
extraordinary review dismissal
Customs Code provisions
administrative court error
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 23 § 1 Kodeksu celnego
art. 29 Kodeksu celnego
art. 23 § 7 Kodeksu celnego
art. 25 Kodeksu celnego
art. 26 Kodeksu celnego
art. 27 Kodeksu celnego
art. 28 Kodeksu celnego
art. 393 § 1 KPC