Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 845/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal for failing to request time restoration within 7 days after losing excuse for delay.

Case Number I PKN 845/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal and cassation regarding a dispute over employment contract termination and compensation. The plaintiffs initially sought correction of work certificates stating they abandoned their jobs, later shifting to damages claims while missing the strict 7-day deadline to request time restoration. The court ruled that filing lawsuits for damages did not constitute a request to restore the deadline, and since the legal excuses for the delay had expired, the time bar applied strictly.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 § 2 k.p.: Filing a lawsuit for damages does not constitute a request to restore the time limit for filing an appeal; once the legal excuse for the delay expires, the time limit runs strictly.

Keywords

AI generated
time restoration request statute of limitations employment contract termination civil procedure code missed deadline legal excuse expiration damages claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 § 2 k.p.
Art. 378 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 65 § 1 k.p.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 378 § 2 k.p.c
art. 386 § 4 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 51/77
I PRN 37/78

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text