I PKN 845/00
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for failing to request time restoration within 7 days after losing excuse for delay.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal and cassation regarding a dispute over employment contract termination and compensation. The plaintiffs initially sought correction of work certificates stating they abandoned their jobs, later shifting to damages claims while missing the strict 7-day deadline to request time restoration. The court ruled that filing lawsuits for damages did not constitute a request to restore the deadline, and since the legal excuses for the delay had expired, the time bar applied strictly.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 § 2 k.p.: Filing a lawsuit for damages does not constitute a request to restore the time limit for filing an appeal; once the legal excuse for the delay expires, the time limit runs strictly.
Keywords
AI generated
time restoration request
statute of limitations
employment contract termination
civil procedure code
missed deadline
legal excuse expiration
damages claim
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 § 2 k.p.
Art. 378 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 65 § 1 k.p.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 378 § 2 k.p.c
art. 386 § 4 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PZP 51/77
I PRN 37/78