Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 816/00 AI generated

Supreme Court allows anniversary bonus claim where transitional regulation violates equal treatment principle.

Case Number I PKN 816/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for an anniversary bonus, remanding the case for a new decision. The plaintiff argued that a transitional regulation denying him a bonus for 30 years of service violated the principle of equal treatment under Article 112 of the Labor Code. The court found that completely depriving the plaintiff of the bonus constituted an unreasonable distinction compared to employees with only local service, thus establishing a violation of equal treatment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 112 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c. - A transitional regulation denying an anniversary bonus to an employee who previously received a bonus for general service constitutes an unreasonable distinction violating the principle of equal treatment if it results in a less favorable outcome compared to employees with only local service.

Keywords

AI generated
anniversary bonus entitlement principle of equal treatment transitional regulation validity unreasonable distinction labor code provisions service length calculation remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 112 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 112 k.p
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 24113 k.p
art. 113 k.p
art. 42 k.p
art. 24113 § 2 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text