Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 34/00 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review as no serious legal error existed regarding property acquisition authority.

Case Number III ZP 34/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed an extraordinary review against a decision ordering the forced acquisition of land within a protected zone. The Naczelný Sąd Administracyjny had ruled that the Supreme Court's prior interpretation regarding the competent authority for such acquisitions was not a serious legal error. The Court held that since alternative interpretations of the law were possible, the administrative court's choice did not constitute a serious violation of law, rendering the extraordinary review inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 84 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o ochronie i kształtowaniu środowiska; A choice between alternative legal interpretations by an administrative court does not constitute a serious violation of law unless the interpretation is objectively impossible.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review serious violation of law alternative legal interpretation property acquisition protected zone administrative court legal error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 84 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 31 stycznia 1980 r. o ochronie i kształtowaniu środowiska
art. 39314 § 1 KPC
art. 39314 § 3 KPC
art. 39312 KPC
art. 57 ust. 2 ustawy o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok z dnia 6 stycznia 1993 r., I PRN 71/92
wyrok z dnia 11 października 1994 r., I PO 11/94
wyrok z dnia 20 czerwca 1995 r., III ARN 22/95
wyrok z dnia 17 kwietnia 1997 r., III RN 10/97

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text