Termination due to job elimination is valid if the process is sufficiently advanced, even without formal regulation changes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor court ruling that rejected her claim for invalid termination. The court found that the employer's decision to eliminate the legal advisor's position and outsource legal services constituted a real cause for termination, as the administrative process was sufficiently advanced to make the elimination inevitable. Consequently, the court held that the formalization of organizational changes via new regulations was not a prerequisite for a valid termination based on actual job elimination.