I PKN 726/00
AI generated
Dismissal of appeal: vague employer expectations without specificity fail to justify dismissal under Labor Code.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a termination of an indefinite-term employment contract. The employer cited 'failure to meet expectations' but failed to specify what those expectations were, while the employee had received full bonuses and training. The court ruled that such a vague reason does not constitute a concrete and factual justification for dismissal under the Labor Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 30 § 4 KP; Art. 45 § 1 KP: A reason for terminating an indefinite-term employment contract must be concrete and factual; a vague reference to 'failure to meet expectations' without specifying the content of those expectations is insufficient to justify the dismissal.
Keywords
AI generated
Labor Code
indefinite term contract
termination justification
vague reason
dismissal appeal
employee expectations
labor dispute
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 30 § 4 KP
Art. 45 § 1 KP
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 378 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC