Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III ZP 20/01 AI generated

Supreme Court answers two labor law questions on work time balancing and holy days while refusing a third.

Case Number III ZP 20/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland answered two legal questions regarding work time balancing and the impact of holy days on weekly work hours. The Court ruled that holy days falling on weekdays reduce the total number of work days and hours in the settlement period. However, the Court refused to answer the third question concerning four-shift organizations, citing the principle that abstract legal interpretation should occur during specific case proceedings rather than through general rulings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 129 § 1 k.p.; Art. 138 § 1 k.p.: The Supreme Court may provide abstract interpretations of labor law provisions only when necessary to resolve specific legal disputes, refusing to issue rulings on hypothetical scenarios lacking concrete factual premises or demonstrated judicial inconsistencies.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law interpretation work time balancing holy day off four-shift organization abstract legal interpretation labor code provisions weekly work hours

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 129 § 1 k.p.
Art. 138 § 1 k.p.
Art. 132 § 4 k.p.
Art. 132 § 5 k.p.
Art. 22 ust. 2 ustawy o związkach zawodowych
art. 129 § 1 k.p
art. 138 § 1 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text