Supreme Court allows family pension claim by defining work contract and rejecting judge change argument.

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's request for a family pension following a workplace accident. The court found that the deceased worked under an oral contract for specific tasks, establishing an employment relationship despite the lack of formal written documentation. Regarding the cassation complaint about the replacement of the reporting judge, the court ruled that Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not mandate a new report upon such a change.