Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 18/01 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; taxpayer without patent rights cannot claim 50% investment tax relief.

Case Number III RN 18/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review of the tax authority's decision denying investment tax relief to a taxpayer. The taxpayer purchased a machine intended for a patented process but failed to obtain the necessary patent or license rights from the original inventor. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for investment relief is satisfied only if the taxpayer holds the patent or license, not merely if the machine is associated with a patented process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 3 ust. 2a rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 25 stycznia 1994 r.; The taxpayer is entitled to the 50% investment tax relief only if they hold the patent or license for the machine used, not if the machine is merely associated with a patented process.

Keywords

AI generated
investment tax relief patent rights requirement extraordinary review dismissal investment deduction tax authority decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 3 ust. 2a rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 25 stycznia 1994 r. w sprawie odliczeń od dochodu wydatków inwestycyjnych oraz obniżek podatku dochodowego
art. 7 KPA
77 § 1 KPA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text