III RN 18/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; taxpayer without patent rights cannot claim 50% investment tax relief.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review of the tax authority's decision denying investment tax relief to a taxpayer. The taxpayer purchased a machine intended for a patented process but failed to obtain the necessary patent or license rights from the original inventor. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for investment relief is satisfied only if the taxpayer holds the patent or license, not merely if the machine is associated with a patented process.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 3 ust. 2a rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 25 stycznia 1994 r.; The taxpayer is entitled to the 50% investment tax relief only if they hold the patent or license for the machine used, not if the machine is merely associated with a patented process.
Keywords
AI generated
investment tax relief
patent rights requirement
extraordinary review dismissal
investment deduction
tax authority decision
Cited Legislation
AI generated§ 3 ust. 2a rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 25 stycznia 1994 r. w sprawie odliczeń od dochodu wydatków inwestycyjnych oraz obniżek podatku dochodowego
art. 7 KPA
77 § 1 KPA