I PZ 75/01
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed because the appellant failed to correctly state the subject matter value per Civil Procedure Code rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a labor court decision rejecting the appeal. The appellant's lawyer admitted to a clerical error in stating the subject matter value, which should have been 19,407.07 PLN based on tax declarations, but was incorrectly stated as 7,194 PLN. The court ruled that the obligation to correctly determine this value lies with the party making the appeal, and the lower court was not required to correct the error on its own initiative.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 3921 § 1 KPC; art. 231 KPC; The party filing an appeal bears the obligation to correctly determine the value of the subject matter of the appeal, and the court is not obliged to correct a low valuation unless there is evidence of arbitrary determination.
Keywords
AI generated
civil procedure code
appeal admissibility
subject matter value
clerical error
court duty to correct
labor dispute
procedural defect
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 3921 § 1 KPC
art. 231 KPC
art. 393 § 2 KPC
art. 3933 § 1 KPC
art. 39319 KPC
art. 385 KPC
art. 397 § 2 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 2 kwietnia 1998 r., II UZ 24/98
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 6 listopada 1996 r., II UKN 12/96
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 13 października 2000 r., II UKN 602/00