II UKN 560/00
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal on social security inactivity when benefits were paid despite undelivered decisions.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by a pensioner claiming the social security office's inactivity due to non-delivery of benefit decisions. Although the court found the office issued and paid the increased benefits, it ruled that judicial review for inactivity is unavailable when the obligation was discretionary rather than mandatory. Consequently, the court declared the appeal inadmissible and set aside the lower court's rulings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 23 ust. 1 i 3 ustawy o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych; art. 4779 § 4 KPC: An appeal for inactivity is inadmissible when the social security office has issued and executed a decision, as the recipient must have actively requested the performance of a statutory duty.
Keywords
AI generated
social security inactivity
non-delivery of decisions
discretionary benefit increase
judicial review limitation
mandatory vs discretionary duty
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 23 ust. 1 i 3 ustawy z dnia 25 listopada 1986 r. o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 4779 § 4 KPC
art. 109 § 1 i art. 46 KPA
art. 95 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 KPC
art. 39316 KPC