Court holds TIR holder paying duty for undelivered goods is liable for customs breach, not a new trader.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the carrier's appeal against a customs fine for failing to deliver goods to the designated office. The court found that by transferring goods to an unknown recipient, the carrier violated customs obligations under the Customs Act and the TIR Convention. The court ruled that this failure does not transform the carrier into a new trader but simply establishes liability for the duty owed on the undelivered goods.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 42 in conjunction with Art. 45 ust. 5 of the Customs Act; Art. 36 of the Geneva TIR Convention: Failure to deliver goods to the designated customs office by a TIR holder constitutes a customs obligation breach, making the payment of duty the applicable sanction without requiring a finding that the carrier has transformed into a new trader.