Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 612/00 AI generated

Employment contract termination not time-limited; employer may terminate based on persistent valid reasons until they lose relevance.

Case Number I PKN 612/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's appeal to reinstate her employment after the employer terminated the contract due to long-term absences disrupting court operations. The court found that while the employee's health improved slightly in 1998, the reason for termination remained valid as the absences continued to cause organizational difficulties. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer's decision to terminate was justified and did not lose its legal effect.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 254 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 254 § 2 Kodeksu pracy: Termination of an employment contract is not subject to a time limit and remains valid as long as the reason accepted by the employer has not lost its relevance.

Keywords

AI generated
termination of employment contract long-term employee absences organizational disruption loss of relevance of reason labor law termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 399 § 15 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text