Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZ 59/01 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal as late; new lawyer's request for judgment copy did not restart appeal deadline.

Case Number I PZ 59/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal because it was filed after the statutory deadline. Although the court had restored the time limit for the original appeal, the appellant's new counsel's request for a copy of the judgment with reasoning was merely informational and did not constitute a new appeal. The court held that since the original appeal had already been validly filed within the restored period, the appellant could not file a second appeal based on the new counsel's actions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9 KPC; Art. 3934 § 1 KPC: A request for a copy of a judgment with reasoning under Art. 9 KPC is informational and does not restart the appeal deadline; a party may file only one appeal per case, and a new counsel's request does not constitute a new appeal if one was already validly filed.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal deadline new counsel judgment copy single appeal rule procedural time limit informational request court appointment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9 KPC
Art. 3934 § 1 KPC
Art. 39318 § 3 KPC
Art. 397 § 3 KPC
Art. 385 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
IV CZ 147/87

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text