Supreme Court dismisses teacher's appeal regarding dismissal based on work evaluation and timing of notice.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal seeking reinstatement and damages after her dismissal from a primary school. The court found that the decision was based on a rational criterion of work performance and student teaching results, not arbitrary factors. Furthermore, the court ruled that the three-month notice period applies only to contract termination, not to the specific declaration of inactivity, and that differential treatment based on job role does not constitute discrimination.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 20 ust. 1, 3 Karty Nauczyciela; art. 112, 113 Kodeksu Pracy: The declaration of a teacher's inactivity is not a contract termination and is not subject to the three-month notice period; differential treatment based on work performance and role is not discrimination.