Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 48/01 AI generated

Filing a personal cassation appeal does not interrupt the deadline for requesting a time extension.

Case Number II UZ 48/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Second Instance Court's rejection of his late personal cassation. The applicant argued that the procedural deadline for filing the cassation had expired due to his own fault, while the opposing party contended the appeal did not interrupt the statutory period for requesting a time extension. The court ruled that under the Code of Civil Procedure, filing a personal cassation does not interrupt the running of the deadline to request a time extension, rendering the cassation untimely.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 169 § 1 KPC; art. 3935 KPC: Filing a personal cassation appeal does not interrupt the statutory period for requesting a time extension to file the cassation.

Keywords

AI generated
personal cassation time extension procedural deadline interruption of term Code of Civil Procedure supreme court untimely appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 169 § 1 KPC
art. 3935 KPC
art. 385 KPC
art. 397 § 1 KPC
art. 397 § 2 KPC
art. 397 § 3 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text