II UZ 48/01
AI generated
Filing a personal cassation appeal does not interrupt the deadline for requesting a time extension.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Second Instance Court's rejection of his late personal cassation. The applicant argued that the procedural deadline for filing the cassation had expired due to his own fault, while the opposing party contended the appeal did not interrupt the statutory period for requesting a time extension. The court ruled that under the Code of Civil Procedure, filing a personal cassation does not interrupt the running of the deadline to request a time extension, rendering the cassation untimely.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 169 § 1 KPC; art. 3935 KPC: Filing a personal cassation appeal does not interrupt the statutory period for requesting a time extension to file the cassation.
Keywords
AI generated
personal cassation
time extension
procedural deadline
interruption of term
Code of Civil Procedure
supreme court
untimely appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 169 § 1 KPC
art. 3935 KPC
art. 385 KPC
art. 397 § 1 KPC
art. 397 § 2 KPC
art. 397 § 3 KPC