Cassation dismissed because plaintiff failed to cite specific circumstances justifying review, violating procedural requirements.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a lower court's judgment awarding compensation for patent rationalization projects. The appellant argued for a review based on material law and procedural errors but failed to explicitly cite the specific circumstances required by law to justify the cassation review. The court held that the appellate court was correct to reject the appeal because the statutory requirement to present these justifying circumstances was not met, even if they could be inferred from the cassation grounds.