Supreme Court partially dismissed appeal, remanding case to lower court regarding statutory bonus eligibility.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially dismissed the cassation appeal, quashing the lower court's award of a statutory bonus and remanding the case for a new ruling on costs. The plaintiff argued he was entitled to a bonus for 30 years of service, but the lower courts failed to consider his concurrent employment in another full-time position and the nature of his side contract. The court held that the lower courts violated statutory provisions by ignoring evidence of full-time work elsewhere and insufficiently analyzing the side contract's character, thus depriving the plaintiff of the bonus under the relevant labor law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 8 ust. 3 pkt 4, 5 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; The statutory bonus for 30 years of service is denied if the employee is simultaneously employed in another full-time position or engaged in business activities, and the court must thoroughly examine all facts to determine eligibility.