Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 477/00 AI generated

Supreme Court holds collective agreement rules on bonuses prevail over employer discretion unless higher law dictates otherwise.

Case Number II UKN 477/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and remanded the case for retrial after finding the lower court's interpretation of the collective agreement invalid. The plaintiffs argued their bonus entitlement was regulatory, while the employer claimed it was discretionary under the collective agreement. The court ruled that the collective agreement's provisions on bonus creation and distribution must be interpreted as a whole and cannot be overridden by the employer's unilateral decisions without violating higher legal norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 2416 Kodeksu Pracy; Art. 32 ust. 2 ustawy o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych: The provisions of a collective agreement regarding employee remuneration must be interpreted as a whole and cannot be overridden by the employer's unilateral decisions unless such interpretation leads to a result inconsistent with a higher legal act.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement interpretation bonus entitlement dispute employer discretion limits labor law hierarchy remuneration regulation supreme court review procedural remand

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 2416 Kodeksu Pracy
Art. 32 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych
Art. 37 ustawy z dnia 29 września 1994 r. o rachunkowości
Art. 386 § 1 Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego
Art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego
Art. 108 Kodeksu Postępowania Cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III PZP 22/85

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text