Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 465/00 AI generated

Work accident claim dismissed because heart attack was a delayed effect of stress, not a sudden external cause.

Case Number II UKN 465/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to establish a work accident resulting in a heart attack. The court found that while the plaintiff faced extreme stress and overwork during flood relief duties, the heart attack was a delayed consequence of these conditions rather than a sudden event caused by an external factor at the time of the illness. Consequently, the court ruled that the legal definition of a work accident requires both a sudden cause and an immediate effect, which were absent in this case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; A work accident requires a sudden external cause and immediate effect, excluding delayed health consequences of prolonged stress or working conditions.

Keywords

AI generated
work accident definition sudden external cause delayed health effect heart attack compensation workplace stress injury workplace accident law immediate effect requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 393 § 15 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 102 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text