I PKN 61/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal filed late due to appointed lawyer's refusal to draft it.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal because it was filed after the deadline expired. Although the plaintiff's appointed lawyers refused to draft the appeal, the court held that their refusal constituted a final procedural decision. Consequently, the court ruled that a subsequent lawyer could not revive the appeal after the case had become final.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 168 § 1 KPC; Art. 3938 § 1 KPC: A court-appointed lawyer may refuse to draft an appeal if it is inadmissible or obviously unfounded, and such refusal precludes the court from restoring the deadline for a subsequent lawyer.
Keywords
AI generated
court-appointed lawyer
refusal to draft appeal
restoration of deadline
finality of judgment
procedural default
civil procedure code
inadmissible appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 3938 § 1 KPC