I PZ 24/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for lack of essential structural elements under Civil Procedure Code Article 3933.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the second-instance court's decision to reject the appeal. The plaintiff argued for restoration of the appeal deadline and cited violations of substantive and procedural law. The court ruled that the appeal lacked essential structural elements required by Article 3933 of the Civil Procedure Code, specifically the circumstances justifying its consideration, rendering it inadmissible ab initio.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 3933 KPC; Art. 39318 KPC; Art. 39319 KPC: An appeal is inadmissible ab initio if it fails to present the circumstances justifying its consideration, as this constitutes a non-curable structural defect under Article 3933 § 1 point 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Keywords
AI generated
structural defect appeal
inadmissible ab initio
essential elements appeal
Civil Procedure Code
restoration of deadline
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 39318 § 1 KPC
art. 380 KPC
art. 39319 KPC
art. 168 § 1 KPC
art. 3934 § 1 KPC
art. 3935 KPC
art. 3933 § 1 pkt 3 KPC
art. 39311 - art. 39313 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII CKN 1385/00
Postanowienie z dnia 9 listopada 2000 r., II CKN 1385/00 Nieprzedstawienie w kasacji okoliczności uzasadniających jej rozpoznanie (art.
C.II. 859/36
C.II. 1811/36
C.III. 319/37
II CKN 404/97
II CKN 711/00