Supreme Court dismissed teacher's appeal; school legally transferred her to inactive status due to organizational changes and refusal of alternative work.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the teacher's cassation appeal regarding her transfer to inactive status. The school proposed a reduced role in a community center and corrective gymnastics classes due to organizational cuts, but the teacher refused both the half-time position and the additional hours despite her qualifications. The court ruled that the school was not obligated to offer a reduced contract when the teacher explicitly rejected the proposed alternatives, making the transfer lawful under the Teachers' Charter.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 20 ust. 1 zd. ostatnie Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 22 ust. 2 Karty Nauczyciela: When organizational changes prevent full employment and the teacher refuses the proposed reduced contract or alternative duties, the school may legally transfer the teacher to inactive status without obligation to offer a reduced contract.